Back to all posts
Saket's Blog

Memvid: Video-Based AI Memory for Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG)

2025-06-11
30 min read
RAGRetrieval-Augmented GenerationVector DatabaseSemantic SearchMemvidVideo StorageAI InfrastructurePythonOpen SourceKnowledge Base

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems rely on large knowledge bases to provide context to language models, but storing and searching through millions of text chunks efficiently can be challenging. Memvid is a new open-source library that tackles this problem in an unconventional way: by using video files as the storage medium for AI memory. In this technical exploration, we'll dive into what Memvid is, how it works under the hood, and how it can be integrated into RAG pipelines. We'll also discuss real-world applications (chatbots, personal assistants, research tools), along with the strengths, limitations, and potential improvements of this approach.

What is Memvid?

Memvid is described as a "video-based AI memory library" that allows you to store millions of text chunks in a single MP4 video file and perform lightning-fast semantic search on them. In essence, Memvid turns an MP4 video into a portable vector database for textual information. Instead of using a traditional vector database (like Pinecone, Weaviate, etc.) which may consume significant RAM and require additional infrastructure, Memvid compresses your knowledge base into a compact video file (plus a small index file) while maintaining quick retrieval performance.

Some key features of Memvid include:

  • Video-as-Database: All text chunks are encoded as frames in a video (MP4), so the video file itself serves as the database for your knowledge. No dedicated database server is needed – just a file you can copy or share easily.
  • Semantic Search: Memvid uses vector embeddings and similarity search to find relevant content with natural language queries, similar to how a vector DB works.
  • Efficiency and Compression: By leveraging modern video codecs (H.264, H.265), Memvid achieves up to 10× compression compared to traditional solutions. It dramatically reduces memory and storage footprints – e.g. thousands of documents can shrink to a gigabyte-scale video.
  • Fast Retrieval: Despite the heavy compression, Memvid reports sub-second query times even on very large corpora (millions of chunks).
  • Offline and Portable: Once the video is generated, no internet or cloud service is required for search – everything runs locally. This makes it great for offline applications or edge devices.
  • Simple API: The library is lightweight (around 1000 lines of Python) and designed to be easy to use – you can get started with just a few lines of code (as we'll see in examples).

In short, Memvid offers a novel approach to AI memory: your entire knowledge base becomes a single video file (plus an index), enabling a "drag-and-drop" vector store that you can use anywhere. Next, let's unpack how it actually works behind the scenes.

How Memvid Works Under the Hood

At first glance, the idea of storing text in a video sounds absurd, as the project's author himself noted. However, the trick lies in combining proven technologies in a clever way: text chunking, embedding, QR codes, video compression, and vector search. Here's an overview of Memvid's pipeline and architecture:

Memvid Pipeline Overview:

  • Document text → split into chunks → compute embedding (vector) for each chunk
  • Each text chunk → encode as a QR code image (visual representation of the text)
  • All QR images → stitched together as frames in a video (MP4 with H.264/H.265 compression)
  • Build index: store each chunk's embedding and its video frame location (JSON index + FAISS index)
  • Query time: user query → embed query vector → FAISS similarity search finds relevant chunks → seek to corresponding video frames → decode QR code to get original text
    Source

In other words, Memvid encodes each text chunk as a QR code image and stores those images sequentially as video frames. Modern video codecs excel at compressing sequences of images, especially if there are redundancies or similarities between frames. Surprisingly, this approach can compress large text datasets effectively. For example, 10,000 PDF documents were compressed into a 1.4 GB MP4 video file using Memvid. The video acts as a container for all the text data.

Semantic indexing: In parallel, Memvid builds a vector index of all the text chunks for fast retrieval. It uses Sentence Transformer embeddings (by default) to convert each chunk into a high-dimensional vector. These vectors are stored in a FAISS index (Facebook AI's similarity search library) and accompanied by a metadata JSON file that maps each vector to its chunk (and frame in the video). This JSON "index" essentially plays the role of a lightweight vector database: it contains the information needed to map a query to the relevant frame in the video. (Currently the index is stored in JSON for simplicity, though future versions may use a binary format for efficiency.)

Querying: When you query Memvid, the system embeds the query (using the same embedding model) and performs a cosine similarity search in the FAISS index to find the top-N closest chunk vectors. This operation is very fast (FAISS is optimized for in-memory vector search). The result is a set of identifiers or pointers to the most relevant chunks. Using the metadata index, Memvid then directly seeks to the corresponding frame(s) in the video file and decodes the QR code(s) to retrieve the original text. Because video files support efficient random access (especially if frames are key-framed properly), Memvid can jump to the needed frames in O(1) time. Only those specific frames are decompressed, rather than reading the whole video.

Notably, the video compression is lossy (especially with codecs like H.265), but QR codes include error correction, which makes the encoded text robust to minor visual degradation. In practice, the text can be recovered accurately from the video frames even though the video is lossy, thanks to the redundancy in QR code encoding.

By combining these steps, Memvid essentially creates a vector-searchable archive of your documents where the MP4 is the storage for text and a sidecar index enables semantic queries. This design means you don't need a separate database server or large in-memory store for the raw text – the heavy data is all in the video file, which is highly compressed. The only thing kept in memory for search is the vector index (which, for millions of entries, can still be memory-hungry but much smaller than the raw text). For example, in the reported 10k PDFs experiment, Memvid's approach reduced runtime RAM usage from over 8 GB (for a traditional vector DB) down to about 200 MB, since only the index and needed frames are loaded.

Performance: Memvid's retrieval speed is on par with or slightly slower than mainstream vector databases, but still in the sub-second range. The author observed ~900 ms query times on that 10k-PDF corpus, compared to ~820 ms with Pinecone (a managed vector DB), a negligible difference for most applications. Benchmarks show that even with 1 million chunks stored (≈1.6 GB video), queries remain ~320 ms on a laptop. This is because most of the heavy lifting (vector math and frame seek) is done efficiently in C++ libraries (FAISS and video codecs). In fact, Memvid can outperform some self-hosted databases; for example, it was noted that a Postgres+pgvector setup might take 2–3 seconds for similar searches, whereas Memvid stays under 1 second at million-scale.

Why Use Memvid for RAG?

Memvid emerged directly from the challenges of building real-world RAG systems. The typical RAG pipeline involves embedding a large document collection and storing those embeddings (and texts) in a vector store. However, developers often encounter issues with scalability, cost, and maintenance of these stores:

  • High memory and storage usage: Many vector databases keep a lot of data in RAM for speed. In the case of our example, searching personal PDFs was eating 8+ GB of RAM just for indexes.
  • Operational complexity: Running a dedicated vector database (like ElasticSearch, Pinecone, Weaviate, etc.) can introduce infrastructure overhead and cost – e.g. cloud fees, managing clusters or servers, scaling issues, etc.
  • Data transfer and portability: Moving a large knowledge base between environments (dev/staging/production, or sharing with collaborators) is non-trivial if it's in a database. But an MP4 file can simply be copied or uploaded to cloud storage and downloaded as needed.
  • Offline or edge scenarios: In some cases, you need RAG capabilities in offline environments (no internet) or on edge devices where running a DB service is impractical.

Memvid addresses these issues by offering a self-contained, file-based solution. For a developer or researcher, using Memvid can feel like just dealing with two files – a .mp4 and an index .json – rather than provisioning a database. This portability means you can "throw it in a bucket and share a link", making it easy to distribute a ready-to-go knowledge base. For example, an organization could build a Memvid file of their entire knowledge repository and give it to users who can run semantic search locally without any server.

Another advantage in RAG contexts is cost: Memvid is free and open-source, and after initial encoding, it doesn't require paid cloud services. There are no API calls or monthly fees to query your data. If your application needs to run on-premises or on personal devices (due to privacy or compliance), Memvid's offline-first nature is a big plus.

Example scenario: Imagine a researcher has thousands of academic papers. Using a vector DB like Pinecone might incur significant costs and requires uploading all data to a remote service. With Memvid, the researcher can encode all papers into a video file locally. The resulting file (perhaps a few GB) can be stored on a hard drive or shared. Queries run locally in under a second, and the entire setup can be paused or moved just by handling the file. This lowers the barrier to using RAG for personal or sensitive datasets.

To summarize, Memvid's relevance to RAG lies in its simplicity and efficiency for large-scale retrieval: it turns the complex problem of managing vast text embeddings into a simpler problem of reading from a file. It essentially gives you a vector store in an MP4. Of course, this unconventional approach comes with trade-offs (discussed later), but it opens up new possibilities for RAG systems, especially those that value portability, low cost, and offline capability.

Integrating Memvid into a RAG Pipeline

Memvid provides a Python API that makes it straightforward to integrate into your existing pipelines. It encapsulates the steps of encoding a knowledge base and querying it. Below is an example of how you might use Memvid in practice:

1. Building a Memvid knowledge base (encoding):

You start by collecting or generating text chunks (for example, splitting documents into chunks of a few hundred tokens). Then use MemvidEncoder to add those chunks and build the video and index:

from memvid import MemvidEncoder

# Example text chunks (in practice, these could come from splitting documents)
chunks = [
    "TCP was invented in 1974.",
    "Rust guarantees memory safety without GC.",
    "The Pythagorean theorem is surprisingly versatile."
]

encoder = MemvidEncoder()
encoder.add_chunks(chunks)                       # add the text chunks to the encoder
encoder.build_video("knowledge_base.mp4",        # output video file
                    "knowledge_index.json")      # output index metadata

Citing the above code: This snippet follows the Memvid quick-start example, where we create an encoder, add chunks, and produce an MP4 + JSON index. Under the hood, build_video will handle embedding each chunk, generating QR code frames, and saving the compressed video and index.

After running this, we get two files: knowledge_base.mp4 containing the compressed chunks, and knowledge_index.json containing the index data. (If you also have PDFs, you could use encoder.add_pdf("file.pdf") to automatically split and add its text – Memvid has built-in PDF ingestion support.)

2. Querying and retrieval:

To use this encoded knowledge base in a RAG system, you'll typically want to retrieve relevant text given a user question. Memvid offers a couple of ways to do this. One is via the MemvidRetriever class which gives you a search interface, and another is via a higher-level chat interface. For integration into custom pipelines or frameworks, MemvidRetriever is handy:

from memvid import MemvidRetriever

retriever = MemvidRetriever("knowledge_base.mp4", "knowledge_index.json")
results = retriever.search("Who invented TCP?", top_k=3)
for chunk, score in results:
    print(f"Match (score {score:.3f}): {chunk}")

In the above, retriever.search(query) returns the top matching chunks and their similarity scores. You can then use those chunks as context for an LLM prompt (e.g., append them to the user's question when querying GPT-4, etc.). Memvid also provides a convenience method get_context(query, max_tokens=N) to retrieve a combined context window of a certain token size, which is useful for directly feeding into a language model.

3. Chat interface:

For a more integrated experience, Memvid has a MemvidChat class and even a web UI. For example:

from memvid import MemvidChat

chat = MemvidChat("knowledge_base.mp4", "knowledge_index.json")
chat.start_session()  # optional: start a chat session (resets context)
answer = chat.chat("What is Rust used for?")
print(answer)

This will use an LLM (you can configure providers like OpenAI or Anthropic) to generate an answer based on the retrieved context. Essentially, MemvidChat wraps the retrieval + prompt construction + LLM querying into one. It will find relevant chunks from the video memory and then incorporate them into a prompt to answer the question, making it easy to build a Q&A chatbot on your documents. The built-in chat can maintain conversational context across turns as well.

Memvid's design allows it to be integrated at different levels: you can use it purely as a retriever (replacing something like Pinecone in an existing RAG toolchain), or use its higher-level chat functionality as a ready-made solution. For instance, you could plug MemvidRetriever into a LangChain pipeline by creating a custom VectorStore wrapper – and in fact, official connectors for LangChain and LlamaIndex are on the roadmap. The library is LLM-agnostic: it works with OpenAI APIs, Anthropic's Claude, or local models, depending on how you configure it. This means you can use Memvid to supply context to any language model of your choice.

Finally, Memvid supports advanced settings for integration flexibility. You can use custom embedding models (e.g., a multilingual transformer) by passing your own model into MemvidEncoder. You can also tune the video encoding parameters (FPS, frame size, codec) to balance between compression and speed. Higher FPS or smaller frame dimensions can pack more data or reduce file size, respectively – Memvid allows these adjustments if needed for your pipeline.

Use Cases and Applications

What kinds of AI applications benefit from Memvid? Since Memvid is essentially a drop-in replacement for a vector store, any RAG-based application dealing with large text corpora could leverage it. Here we highlight a few potential use cases:

  • Chatbots and Virtual Assistants: A chatbot that answers questions based on a knowledge base (company documentation, product info, etc.) can use Memvid to store that knowledge. For example, a customer support bot could have all manuals and FAQs encoded in a Memvid file. When users ask questions, the bot retrieves the relevant info from the video memory and formulates answers. The built-in MemvidChat interface makes it straightforward to implement a conversational agent that draws from the encoded knowledge.
  • Personal AI Assistants: Individuals can create a Memvid from their personal data – notes, journals, ebooks, bookmarked articles – and have a local AI assistant that works offline. Because Memvid runs without internet once set up, your personal assistant can answer questions about your files anywhere (imagine a researcher on a flight querying a library of papers). The portability of a single MP4 file means you could even carry it on a phone or USB drive and use it across devices.
  • Research Summarization and Literature Review: Researchers often need to sift through thousands of papers or articles. By encoding a literature corpus into Memvid, a research assistant tool could quickly retrieve relevant excerpts for a given query (e.g., "find studies about X from 2020 onwards"). The user could then ask follow-up questions and get summaries with citations, using Memvid to fetch the raw content for the answers. This could accelerate the literature review process by enabling semantic search through a large body of documents.
  • Enterprise Knowledge Bases: Companies can turn their entire knowledge base – wikis, documents, Slack transcripts, etc. – into a Memvid file. This acts as a company-wide AI memory that employees or systems can query. It's easier to deploy than a database (just host the file on an internal server or cloud storage) and can be updated periodically. Use cases include internal Q&A bots, onboarding assistants (new hires ask the bot policy or procedure questions), and tools for quickly locating information in vast corporate docs.
  • Educational Tools: Memvid can power learning assistants that have ingested textbooks, lecture notes, or course materials. Students could query "the video memory" for clarifications or summaries. For instance, an app could encode an entire textbook as video; the student's query triggers Memvid to pull out the relevant section, which the app's LLM then explains in simpler terms.
  • Digital Libraries and Archives: The library use-case is explicitly mentioned by Memvid's creators – one could index thousands of books or news articles in a single video. For archives that need to be searched semantically (e.g., journalists searching news archives, lawyers searching legal documents), Memvid offers a compact way to store and share those indexes.

Across these scenarios, the common thread is using Memvid as a semantic search backend that is easy to ship and share. If your AI application needs to search a large set of texts quickly, but you want to avoid the hassle of running a heavy database, Memvid is an attractive option.

Strengths of Memvid

Memvid's approach brings a number of advantages that make it appealing for developers and researchers:

  • 🔹 Storage Efficiency: Memvid can significantly reduce the storage size of large text corpora. By leveraging decades of video compression research, it often achieves an order-of-magnitude smaller footprint than raw text or typical databases. In one experiment, millions of pages of text (10k PDFs) fit into 1.4 GB video – something that might be several times larger if stored as plain text or in a naive index. This compression can save on disk space and make data transfer much faster.
  • 🔹 No Database Infrastructure: Unlike traditional vector stores that might require running a server or cloud service, Memvid needs no specialized infrastructure. The MP4 file itself is the database, plus a JSON index for lookup. You don't need to maintain a separate service or worry about scaling a database cluster. This simplicity means fewer moving parts in your system and easier deployment (for example, you can send someone two files and they immediately have the Q&A capability on that data).
  • 🔹 Fast Semantic Search: Despite the unusual storage medium, Memvid delivers fast search results. Thanks to FAISS and the efficiency of direct frame access, queries on large datasets return in well under a second in testing. If the video file is stored on an SSD, random access to frames is very quick. The search time scales sub-linearly with data size when using approximate indexes (or roughly linearly with a flat index, which is still quite good given vector math is in C++). This performance is comparable to many vector DB solutions, and often faster than traditional full-text search on the same data.
  • 🔹 Offline and Secure Usage: Memvid is an offline-first solution. After you generate the memory video, no internet connection is required to query it. This is great for privacy – sensitive data stays on the local machine – and for reliability in low-connectivity settings. Security-wise, if needed you can encrypt the MP4 file at rest or wrap it in access-controlled storage (since if someone obtains the file, they could decode the QR frames). Unlike cloud-based RAG solutions, you aren't sending user queries or data to external servers, which can be important for compliance.
  • 🔹 Portability & Reproducibility: Because the entire knowledge base is encapsulated in files, it's easy to version and share. For example, an ML experiment can include a Memvid file of its training knowledge, ensuring exact reproducibility of retrievals. You can keep different versions of your knowledge base as separate video files (for instance, snapshotting it at different points in time). It's as portable as any media file – even streamable. In fact, you could host the MP4 on a CDN or cloud storage and the retrieval process could fetch needed frame bytes via HTTP range requests. This opens the door to serverless architectures where a lambda function pulls just the relevant chunks from an object store on demand.
  • 🔹 Minimal Dependencies & Easy Integration: Memvid is implemented in pure Python (requiring Python 3.8+), with core functionality in about a thousand lines and relying on well-known libraries (OpenCV, FAISS, SentenceTransformers, PyPDF2, etc.). This makes it relatively easy to install (pip install memvid) and integrate. Developers don't need deep expertise in video or retrieval to use it – the API abstracts those details. The project is MIT-licensed and already quite popular on GitHub, suggesting a growing community and support.
  • 🔹 Flexibility: You can customize Memvid in various ways: choose different embedding models (for domain-specific data or multilingual support), adjust chunk sizes and overlaps when encoding (to balance information per chunk vs. granularity), and even pick codecs (H.264 vs H.265) or compression quality to control the size vs. fidelity trade-off. This means Memvid can be tuned for different needs – maximum compression for very large corpora, or lower compression if you want extra safety against any data loss in frames.

In summary, Memvid's strengths lie in efficiency, simplicity, and portability. It transforms the problem of scaling RAG memory into something more akin to handling media files, which is a well-trodden path in software.

Limitations and Areas for Improvement

As innovative as Memvid is, it's not a silver bullet for all scenarios. Developers should be aware of its current limitations and the areas where it's still evolving:

  • 🔸 Write/Update Overhead: Memvid's storage format (a sequential video of frames) is essentially append-only. If you need to update the knowledge base frequently (add or remove documents on the fly), Memvid is less convenient. Small changes require re-encoding a new video, which can be time-consuming for large datasets. This is fine for read-heavy use cases (where you encode once and query many times), but not ideal for dynamic data that changes often. The developers have noted this and are exploring delta-encoding or incremental update mechanisms in the roadmap.
  • 🔸 Scalability to Extreme Sizes: While Memvid can handle millions of chunks, it may not scale well to billions of data points, especially if you need distributed querying across machines. Traditional vector databases (or specialized services like Vectara, Pinecone) are still better suited for very large-scale or real-time streaming data. The JSON index in Memvid grows linearly with the number of chunks, and storing tens of millions of embeddings in JSON is not memory-efficient. There is mention of possibly using a binary format or even an SQLite index for larger scales in the future, which could mitigate this. But as of now, consider Memvid for up to, say, a few million chunks – beyond that, a more heavy-duty solution might be necessary.
  • 🔸 Query Speed vs Index Size: Memvid currently can use FAISS in either flat (brute-force) mode or IVF (inverted file) mode for approximate search. A flat index gives exact results but will use more memory and possibly be slower for huge N (though still quite optimized in C++). IVF indexes can reduce query time but need training and introduce approximation. Tuning these for Memvid might require more expertise for optimal performance on very large datasets. Also, loading a very large JSON index into memory can itself be slow. In practice, for moderate sizes (a few million entries), these are manageable trade-offs, but for huge corpora the initial load time and memory footprint of the index could be an issue.
  • 🔸 Lossy Compression Concerns: Using lossy video codecs means there is a theoretical risk of losing some data in the text if a QR code frame is too degraded by compression. Memvid mitigates this by using QR codes with error correction (and you can adjust the quality or use a less lossy setting if desired). The likelihood of an uncorrectable error is low when using decent quality settings (and H.264 at high bitrate is almost lossless for QR patterns). Still, if absolute fidelity is required (e.g., encoding something like DNA sequences or code where every character must be perfect), one might worry about the lossy nature. In practice for plain language text, this hasn't proven problematic in testing. Nonetheless, future improvements could explore lossless codecs or alternative encoding of text that compress more like text (e.g., using specialized compression algorithms instead of video).
  • 🔸 Not a Traditional Database: Memvid sacrifices many features of traditional databases. There are no ACID transactions, no concurrent writes (you shouldn't have two processes trying to build the video at once), and no fine-grained update or deletion of individual chunks. It's meant for a read-mostly, static dataset scenario. If your application needs frequent updates, multi-user writes, or complex query operators beyond semantic similarity (like filters, boolean queries, etc.), you would have to implement those on top or use another system in conjunction.
  • 🔸 Ecosystem and Maturity: Being a relatively new project (as of 2025, Memvid is a v0.1.x release), it's still maturing. The concept gained a lot of attention quickly, but it will take time to see how it performs in diverse real-world deployments. There may be edge-case bugs or performance hiccups to iron out. The good news is that it's open source and evolving fast – for example, support for WASM-based retrieval (running the search in-browser) and official LangChain integration are on the roadmap. Community contributions are also welcomed by the maintainers.

Future improvements that are being considered or would be valuable include:

  • Incremental updates: As mentioned, enabling partial additions to the video without full rebuild (perhaps via chaining videos or clever frame insertion).
  • Smarter index storage: Using a binary format for the index (or an embedded database) to cut down the JSON size and parsing time.
  • Security features: Optionally encrypting the content so that even if someone gets the video file, they cannot read the frames without a key. Currently, anyone with the MP4 can decode the QR codes to get the raw text. Encryption or access control wrappers would be useful for sensitive data scenarios.
  • Optimizations in encoding: Possibly using GPUs to speed up QR code generation or video encoding (e.g., leveraging CUDA for encoding, given video encoding can be hardware-accelerated). Also, experimenting with alternative visual encodings (maybe different image patterns that compress better than QR codes, which are high-contrast) could improve compression ratio further.
  • Native integration with tools: As noted, building plug-and-play compatibility with popular AI frameworks (LangChain, LlamaIndex) will help users adopt Memvid easily in their pipelines. This likely involves writing wrapper classes or connectors that present Memvid as a vector store interface those frameworks expect.

Despite these limitations, it's worth reiterating that Memvid shines in scenarios it was designed for: pack once, read often knowledge bases that need to be portable and efficient. For those, its benefits often outweigh the drawbacks.

Conclusion

Memvid represents a creative re-imagining of how we can store and retrieve knowledge for AI applications. By literally treating data as "frames in a film", it turns an MP4 file into a fast, queryable repository of information. For developers and researchers building RAG systems, Memvid offers an intriguing alternative to traditional vector databases – one that can simplify deployments and cut costs, especially at moderate scales. We've explored how Memvid works (chunking, embeddings, QR codes, video compression, and indexing) and seen code examples of using it in practice. We've also considered use cases ranging from chatbots to research assistants, and weighed its pros and cons.

In the end, Memvid may not replace all databases, but it opens up new possibilities: imagine carrying an entire knowledge base on a USB drive, or sharing a "knowledge video" with colleagues, or deploying an AI assistant to an offline device with nothing but a media file. These scenarios are now tangible. As the Memvid project continues to evolve (with planned features like better update support and integrations), it could become a staple tool in the toolkit of AI developers who need efficient, portable memory for their language models. If nothing else, it's a testament to the power of thinking outside the box – or in this case, outside the database – to solve hard problems in AI infrastructure.

Sources:

  • Memvid GitHub Repository – Olow304/memvid (README and documentation)
  • Hacker News and Reddit discussions on Memvid (author's explanation and community commentary)
  • Turn an MP4 into Your Fastest Vector Store: Meet Memvid (2025) – Cohorte blog post (technical deep dive and benchmarks)